Document Details
Name 20161206_NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model_PubRvw.pdf
DescriptionNo description provided.
Document StatePublic Review (Status of a NENA document being reviewed by the Public for a 45-DAY review period.)
Group / FolderCSC DSSC GIS Data Model for NG9-1-1 WG / Public Review / Posted Public Review 12_2016
SubmitterBy Ms. Delaine Arnold, ENP-Admin on Thu, Dec 8 2016 11:13 pm UTC
ModifiedBy Ms. Delaine Arnold, ENP-Admin on Wed, Mar 15 2017 4:06 pm UTC
Public URLhttps://dev.nena.org/higherlogic/ws/public/document?document_id=9828&wg_id=csds-gis

Comments

Showing 210 of 210 comments
Subject#StateSubmitterDateAction
Recommended Reading and References0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Unit0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Directionals0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Site NENA GUID0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Seat0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Road Class0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Road Class0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Postal Community Name0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Postal Code0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Parity0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Neighborhood Community0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Left TO Address0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Floor0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
County NGUID0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Country0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Complete Landmark Name0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Building0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Alias0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Alias Complete Landmark Name and NGUID0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Address Number0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Additional Location Information0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Mile Marker Location0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Unincorporated Community Boundary and Neighborhood Community Bou0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Complete Landmark Name Alias Methodology0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Landmark Name Table Missing0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Landmark Name Part Methodology0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Site/Structure Address Points0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Street Name Alias Table0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Street Name Alias Methodology0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Street Name and One-Way Fields0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
RCL_NGUID0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Required Layers vs. Recommended Layers0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Number vs. Integer0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
GIS Data Model Layers - Field Widths0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Spatial Reference0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
GIS Data Format0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
NENA Globally Unique IDs (NGUID)0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
NENA Globally Unique IDs (NGUID)0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Add Reference to FGDC Address Standard0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Timeline to Resolve0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Definition of NGUID0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Definition differences with CLDXF0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
References to CLDXF Standard0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Missing reference to FGDC Standard0AcceptedEd Wells2017-03-15Details
Landmark Name Part Table0AcceptedCheryl Benjamin2017-03-01Details
Display Name0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
10th row in table (Service Number)0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
Punctuation0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
Grammar change0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
Grammar change0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
Section 00AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
Wording clarity0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
Wording clarity0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
Transformation question0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
maintenance0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
maintenance0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
numeric or text0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
data is usually contained0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
standardized0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
respected0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
33rd row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "XML"0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
30th row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "URN"0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
27th row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "SI"0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
23rd row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "NGUID"0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
22nd row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "NG9-1-0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
21st row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "NENA"0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
19th row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "Metada0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
18th row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "MCS"0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
17th row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "LVF"0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
13th row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "Geocod0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
12th row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "FGDC"0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
10th row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "ESInet0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
7th row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "Data Mo0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
6th row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "Data La0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
2nd row of table, 2nd column: Definition/Description of "Attribu0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
Grammar consistency0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
Grammar consistency0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
Grammar consistency0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-03-01Details
Agency ID0AcceptedRaymond Horner2017-03-01Details
Agency V Card0AcceptedRaymond Horner2017-03-01Details
Mandatory Date Fields (all layers)0AcceptedRaymond Horner2017-02-28Details
3.6 Spatial Reference Wording0AcceptedRaymond Horner2017-02-28Details
Data Domain Section 3.30AcceptedRaymond Horner2017-02-28Details
Add Appendix0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Non essential content0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Non essential content0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Consider need for new left and right name fields.0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Add eight new attributes to RCL table.0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Eliminate non essential data0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Change Classification of APs0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Relocate Text0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Editorial changes and simplification of language.0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Out of Scope Concern0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Unnecessary or redundant text.0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Clarification recommended0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Definition needed0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Authoritative Boundary0AcceptedRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
Compilation of comments from a County team of 911/ GIS staff0AcceptedDavid Skoronski2017-02-28Details
Expiration Date field0AcceptedFrederic Iausly2017-02-28Details
Road Centerlines0AcceptedFrederic Iausly2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0WithdrawnDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
General interest0AcceptedDeb Rozeboom-ENP2017-02-28Details
Street Name Pre Types0AcceptedFrederic Iausly2017-02-28Details
Multiple Comments in Attachment0WithdrawnMartha Wells2017-02-28Details
Section 4.5 - Site/Structure Points schema0AcceptedDavid Haas2017-02-28Details
Emergency Service Boundary vs ESN, ESZ0AcceptedDavid Quintanilla2017-02-28Details
Multiple comments in attachment0WithdrawnRichard Kelly2017-02-28Details
allow multi-point feature type0AcceptedChristian Jacqz2017-02-28Details
relational approach to SSAPs0AcceptedChristian Jacqz2017-02-28Details
Emergency Service Boundary section0AcceptedMichael Fashoway2017-02-27Details
emergency service provider0AcceptedMichael Fashoway2017-02-27Details
Emergency Service Boundary0AcceptedMichael Fashoway2017-02-27Details
Use of the word primarily0AcceptedMichael Fashoway2017-02-27Details
validate primarily civic (address) location0AcceptedMichael Fashoway2017-02-27Details
Determines the correct emergency responding agencies0AcceptedMichael Fashoway2017-02-27Details
Elevation field description.0AcceptedDan Banks2017-02-24Details
Incorrect datetime description, domain, and examples.0AcceptedDan Banks2017-02-24Details
PSAP boundary service definition.0AcceptedDan Banks2017-02-24Details
Date/time datatype definition is inappropriate.0AcceptedDan Banks2017-02-24Details
Text data type0AcceptedDan Banks2017-02-24Details
Incorrect spatial reference description0AcceptedDan Banks2017-02-24Details
Numbered route should not be primary name0AcceptedChristian Jacqz2017-02-23Details
addressing authority0AcceptedChristian Jacqz2017-02-23Details
Methodology Problems0AcceptedJason Horning-ENP2017-02-22Details
Emergency Service Boundary0AcceptedJason Horning-ENP2017-02-22Details
SI / LVF / ECRF Relationship0AcceptedJason Horning-ENP2017-02-22Details
Required, Strongly Recommended, Recommended0WithdrawnJason Horning-ENP2017-02-22Details
'Mile Post NENA Globally Unique ID' should be type 'Text'0AcceptedRick Hollatz2017-02-21Details
Private is not a road class0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Mile Post Measurement Value0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
mile post indicator0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Ranges reverse direction0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
linestring not defined0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
add qualifier to GIS0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Lakes as segments?0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
longer definition needed0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Cell site vs. Cell sector0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Change to caps?0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Street name alias clarification0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
layer-related ID prefix0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
type of emergency service provider0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
PSAP boundary clarification0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
left/right address ranges0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Case not important - question0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Mandatory for each record0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
add wording0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
better wording0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
add vendors0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
unique ID format0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Pre-validate0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
nomadic calling device0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
URN vs. URI0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
ESInet communications0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
scrivener's error0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Validation vs. pre-validation0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
layers vs. databases0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
wording redundant?0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Provisioned with, not by0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Timing of validation0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Awkward wording0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Highly accurate0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Layer - singular0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
scrivener's errors etc0AcceptedRick Ingle2017-02-21Details
Better definition of Date Updated0AcceptedDavid Cordray, ENP2017-02-15Details
Please add USNG grid line layers to ALL US 911 PSAP / CAD layers0AcceptedArt Hansen2017-02-13Details
Reading References0OverriddenAl Studt2017-02-10Details
Reading References0OverriddenAl Studt2017-02-10Details
Add US National Grid lines to REQUIRED section0OverriddenAl Studt2017-02-10Details
Add Abbreviation USNG0OverriddenAl Studt2017-02-10Details
Centerline Parity fields0AcceptedBrian Crumpler2017-02-07Details
addressing authority0AcceptedChristian Jacqz2017-02-06Details
landmark0AcceptedChristian Jacqz2017-02-06Details
building0AcceptedChristian Jacqz2017-02-06Details
transition from legacy systems to NG0AcceptedChristian Jacqz2017-02-06Details
ambiguity in area definitions0AcceptedChristian Jacqz2017-02-06Details
GIS consistency0AcceptedChristian Jacqz2017-02-06Details
GIS consistency0AcceptedChristian Jacqz2017-02-06Details
Left Parity, Right Parity should be Conditional0AcceptedRobert Long2017-02-02Details
centerline schema missing validation flags0AcceptedBrian Crumpler2017-01-24Details
Backwards Compatibility0AcceptedBrian Crumpler2017-01-18Details
Incorrect Service URN Examples0AcceptedBrian Crumpler2017-01-18Details
Service Area Boundaries - Required Layers0AcceptedBrian Crumpler2017-01-18Details
Municipality Should be Expaned0AcceptedShawna Ernst2017-01-09Details
One Way Additional Domain Value Needed0AcceptedShawna Ernst2017-01-09Details
Unit Field Should be Split0AcceptedShawna Ernst2017-01-09Details
Driveways0AcceptedShawna Ernst2017-01-09Details
Street Name field cannot always be legal name0AcceptedShawna Ernst2017-01-09Details
Site/Structure Address Points Alias Table0AcceptedJohn Peabody2016-12-19Details
Landmark Name Part Table0AcceptedJohn Peabody2016-12-19Details
St_PreTyp & St_PosTyp field lengths too short0AcceptedMichael Fashoway2016-12-16Details
Field length discrepancy for Legacy STS0AcceptedDavid Cordray, ENP2016-12-15Details
Inconsistency in ESB/ESZ requirements0AcceptedTom Homan2016-12-14Details
Date Field text width incorrect0AcceptedTom Homan2016-12-14Details
Horizontal Accuracy0AcceptedJohn Peabody2016-12-13Details
Include US National Grid Values for Incident Location0AcceptedJules McNeff2016-12-13Details
GIS needs to allow two locations per 911 call0AcceptedJoseph Elfelt2016-12-13Details
Geolocation: latitude longitude *and* USNG0AcceptedJoseph Elfelt2016-12-13Details
Mile Post/Markers0AcceptedRobert White2016-12-09Details