Comment 2458
Accepted (Resolved)
NENA-STA-015.10-201X_DataFormats_PubRvw (Revision 0)
Comment Submitted by
Cheryl Benjamin
2017-12-22 16:12:24

The note in Section 18.1 Preface references "a NENA NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model" and indicates "additional work is required to develop" it. This comment could be interpreted to mean that the NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model is far from completion, which is not true.  The NENA NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model (NENA-STA-006) has been developed and has already undergone several reviews, including a public review.  Almost all of the public review comments received have been adjudicated and a second public review is expected early 2018 with publication in 2018. The Note in Section 18.1 should acknowledge the development of NENA-STA-006.

Submitter Proposed Solution

Acknowledge the NENA NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model (NENA-STA-006) has been developed and is undergoing Public Review. Add "(NENA-STA-006)" after all references to "NENA NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model" in this paragraph.

Mr. Richard Muscat
2018-02-20 12:17 pm EST

Accepted.

Mr. Richard Muscat
2018-02-20 1:23 pm EST

Accepted, to read as follows below:

Note:  This data model is NOT compliant with Civic Location Data Exchange Format (CLDXF) (NENA-STA-004) and does not meet the GIS requirements for the NENA i3 solution (NENA-STA-010).  As of the publication of this document, the NENA NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model (NENA-STA-006) has been developed and is undergoing Public Review as of the most recent revision of this document.  It is recognized that this Version 2.0 may have become somewhat unclear on some aspects and may be different than or inconsistent with what may be expected to be adopted in the NENA NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model (NENA-STA-006).  However, because Version 2.0 is expected to be essentially substantively superfluous prospectively once the NENA NG 9-1-1 GIS Data Model (NENA-STA-006) has been adopted, no attempt has been made to update Version 2.0 to provide any additional or increased substantive clarity or to reconcile Version 2.0 with what is expected to be adopted in the NENA NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model ((NENA-STA-006) although a couple of non-substantive typographical errors in Version 2.0 were corrected).